![]() |
|
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
| View Poll Results: Which DOCTYPE do you use? | |||
| Strict |
|
31 | 64.58% |
| Transistional |
|
15 | 31.25% |
| Other |
|
2 | 4.17% |
| Both |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
WLC Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 36
|
I use strict of course. I have just gotten really use to it. I mean it also helps me develop good code, nothing left out. and shows most of my errors. Clients in my own experience like Strict better because they know its clean code.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. l To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. l To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Justin Garza - Internet Entrepreneur |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
WLC Lover
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Roosendaal, The Netherlands
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
WLC Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newyork city
Posts: 28
|
hmm i have never used strict well techinically i have but it ruined my entire site,
so now and days i use Transistional
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
WLC Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 49
|
I always use strict. I don't see the point of Transitional, and never use it.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
WLC Lover
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 71
|
joe: Well, one of the points of using a Transitional DOCTYPE from my perspective would probably be to ease old and brand-new developers alike into coding standards-compliant sites since Transitional DOCTYPEs are far more lenient. They're also useful when the leap to a Strict DOCTYPE is just too big or too costly (in time usually) for certain projects where one person or a small team of people are tasked with converting a huge site (3,000+ static HTML pages, for instance) over to web standards.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
WLC Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 49
|
I can understand why people starting off would use Transitional then work to Strict, but I don't think it's alright for professional coders to use Transitional, just like they shouldn't be using tables for layouts and iFrames.
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
WLC Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 20
|
Strict, of course.
__________________
project.47 - Portfolio & Personal Website To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
WLC Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3
|
If you are serving an HTML document with a DOCTYPE with a transitional DTD it will usually be rendered in quirks mode, whilst a strict DTD will result in a page being rendered in standards mode.
Quirks mode emulates the rendering capability of older browsers (MS4,NS4)... why anyone in their right mind would want to do this is beyond me. Can you guess I use HTML 4.01 with a strict DTD now?
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
WLC Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Turkey / Rize
Posts: 39
|
I'm using xhtml 1.0 strict and i will continue to using this doctype.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
WLC Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 1
|
...whatever is right for the job.
...and you should add 'both' as an option in the poll
__________________
valid != accessible |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Center Problem with CSS | sharingsunshine | CSS | 7 | 27th April 07 03:45 PM |
| Invalid Doctype in IE5 | green_gables | Browser Compatibility | 4 | 22nd February 07 04:07 PM |
| Validation OK, yet page displays differently in IE and FF? | StevenHu | Browser Compatibility | 1 | 21st February 07 09:57 PM |